The Bitcoin community is currently grappling with a divisive proposal known as BIP-110, which focuses on regulating the types of data permissible on its blockchain. As the mandatory signaling phase approaches in early August, miner support remains alarmingly low, sitting below 1%. Historically, this mirrors some of the most contentious governance disputes in Bitcoin's past.

Since its signaling commenced on December 1, 2025, BIP-110 has struggled to gain traction, with miner backing hovering between 0.3% and 0.4%. This is starkly inadequate compared to the 55% threshold needed for early lock-in, indicating a significant disconnect between the proposal's objectives and the community's willingness to adopt them.

The Proposal's Implications

Drafted by developer Dathon Ohm, BIP-110 aims to limit non-monetary data storage on the Bitcoin blockchain for approximately one year, while allowing existing data to remain intact. However, prominent industry figures such as Blockstream CEO Adam Back and MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor have expressed skepticism, framing the proposal as an overreach that jeopardizes Bitcoin's decentralized ethos. Their contention emphasizes the importance of resisting centralized changes, as precedent-setting restrictions could lead to future governance issues.

The timeline for activation is critical. Signaling for BIP-110 is expected to begin around block 961,632, which is estimated to occur between August 7 and August 15, 2026. If the proposal survives this phase, it could enter enforcement around block 965,664 in September 2026, potentially reigniting tensions reminiscent of the Blocksize Wars that plagued the network from 2015 to 2017. During that time, a minority of nodes actively resisted changes, ultimately forcing miners to comply with community consensus.

Currently, node adoption for BIP-110 is strikingly low, primarily found among users running Bitcoin Knots, with negligible interest from major mining pools like F2Pool. The only signs of support are coming from smaller mining operators, whose influence on Bitcoin's overall hashrate is minimal.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice.